Secret Labs Producing GMO Human Clones And Human/Animal Hybrids, Resulting In GMO Animals With Human Capabilities, New Human Species

SECRET MIDDLE EASTERN LAB CREATING HUMAN CLONES

In a secret lab, human clones are being produced. It is only a matter of time before human clones are mass produced, just like Dolly the sheep was. A new human or human/animal species may even result, with no ethical discussion or laws surrounding it.

HISTORY OF HUMAN CLONING

Wikipedia; "With the cloning of a sheep known as Dolly in 1996 by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), the idea of human cloning became a hot debate topic.[3] Many nations outlawed it, while a few scientists promised to make a clone within the next few years. The first hybrid human clone was created in November 1998, by Advanced Cell Technology. It was created using SCNT - a nucleus was taken from a man's leg cell and inserted into a cow's egg from which the nucleus had been removed, and the hybrid cell was cultured, and developed into an embryo. The embryo was destroyed after 12 days.[4]

In 2004 and 2005, Hwang Woo-suk, a professor at Seoul National University, published two separate articles in the journal Science claiming to have successfully harvested pluripotent,embryonic stem cells from a cloned human blastocyst using somatic-cell nuclear transfer techniques. Hwang claimed to have created eleven different patent-specific stem cell lines. This would have been the first major breakthrough in human cloning.[5] However, in 2006 Scienceretracted both of his articles on clear evidence that much of his data from the experiments was fabricated.[6]

On January 2008, Dr. Andrew French and Samuel Wood of the biotechnology companyStemagen announced that they successfully created the first five mature human embryos using SCNT. In this case, each embryo was created by taking a nucleus from a skin cell (donated by Wood and a colleague) and inserting it into a human egg from which the nucleus had been removed. The embyros were developed only to the blastocyst stage, at which point they were studied in processes that destroyed them. Members of the lab said that their next set of experiments would aim to generate embryonic stem cell lines; these are the "holy grail" that would be useful for therapeutic or reproductive cloning.[7][8]

In 2011, scientists at the New York Stem Cell Foundation announced that they had succeeded in generating embyronic stem cell lines, but their process involved leaving the oocyte's nucleus in place, resulting in triploid cells, which would not be useful for cloning.[9][10][11]

In 2013, a group of scientists led by Shoukhrat Mitalipov published the first report of embryonic stem cells created using SCNT. In this experiment, the researchers developed a protocol for using SCNT in human cells, which differs slightly from the one used in other organisms. Four embryonic stem cell lines from human fetal somatic cells were derived from those blastocysts. All four lines were derived using oocytes from the same donor, ensuring that all mitochondrial DNA inherited was identical.[9] A year later, a team led by Robert Lanza at Advanced Cell Technology reported that they had replicated Mitalipov's results and further demonstrated the effectiveness by cloning adult cells using SCNT.[3][12]

LAWS AROUND HUMAN CLONING 

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, a major review of fertility legislation, repealed the 2001 Cloning Act by making amendments of similar effect to the 1990 Act. The 2008 Act also allows experiments on hybrid human-animal embryos.[55]On December 13, 2001, the United Nations General Assembly began elaborating an international convention against the reproductive cloning of humans. A broad coalition of States, including Spain, Italy, the Philippines, the United States, Costa Rica and the Holy See sought to extend the debate to ban all forms of human cloning, noting that, in their view, therapeutic human cloning violates human dignity. Costa Rica proposed the adoption of an international convention to ban all forms of human cloning. Unable to reach a consensus on a binding convention, in March 2005 a non-binding United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning, calling for the ban of all forms of human cloning contrary to human dignity, was adopted.[56][57]

Science fiction has used cloning, most commonly and specifically human cloning, due to the fact that it brings up controversial questions of identity.[60][61] In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World(1932), human cloning is a major plot device that not only drives the story but also makes the reader think critically about what identity means; this concept was re-examined fifty years later inC. J. Cherryh’s novels Forty Thousand in Gehenna (1983) and Cyteen (1988). Kazuo Ishiguro's 2005 novel Never Let Me Go centres on human clones and considers the ethics of the practice.

A recurring sub-theme of cloning fiction is the use of clones as a supply of organs fortransplantation. The 2005 Kazuo Ishiguro novel Never Let Me Go and the 2010 film adaption[62]are set in an alternate history in which cloned humans are created for the sole purpose of providing organ donations to naturally born humans, despite the fact that they are fully sentient and self-aware. The 2005 film The Island[63] revolves around a similar plot, with the exception that the clones are unaware of the reason for their existence. In the futuristic novel The House of the Scorpion, clones are used to grow organs for their wealthy "owners", and the main character was a complete clone.

The use of human cloning for military purposes has also been explored in several works. Star Wars portrays human cloning in Clone Wars,[64] Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones andStar Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, in the form of the Grand Army of the Republic, an army of cloned soldiers. The Expanded Universe also has numerous examples of cloning, including the Thrawn trilogy, The Hand of Thrawn duology, and Clone Wars-era media.

Orphan Black, a sci-fi/drama television series explores the ethical issues, and biological advantages/disadvantages of human cloning through a fictional scientific study on the behavioral adaptation of clones in society.[65]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_clone

In the case of Dolly, the cloned sheep, a mammary cell was used to create 300 cloned eggs. These eggs were fertilized and allowed to grow, and then out of the 30 best fetuses, several came to full term inside of female sheep, but all of them died during or shortly after birth, except for Dolly. All of the other eggs, embryos and fetuses were destroyed or died. The successful birth of one clone meant the creation and destruction of hundreds of other potentially viable sheep. Only one healthy cloned sheep resulted from 300 laboratory attempts.

HUNDREDS OF CLONED EGGS AND FETUSES WILL BE REQUIRED, TO GET ONE HUMAN CLONE TO BE BORN

This same mechanism will be required for the successful cloning of a human being. Many hundreds of eggs, embryos and fetuses will have to be 'cultured' in a lab and then inside of women, before one successful and healthy birth takes place. Many diseased, stillborn and unhealthy cloned babies will be born in the attempts to make one healthy human clone. What are the ethics around this? Should this be allowed? 

MARRIAGE, SEX, AND BIRTH CERTIFICATES NOT REQUIRED, PATENTS AND OWNERSHIP OF HUMAN CLONES POSSIBLE

If cloning is perfected in humans, marriage, sex and birth certificates will no longer be required; all of this will be optional. Cloned humans can be created, patented and sold on the market just like animals, for slaves, warfare military fodder, for body parts, and for genetic or drug experimentation in labs. Do cloned humans have basic human rights, or can these clones grown in a lab artificially be grown, chopped up for parts and sold to hospitals for body parts to be used for transplants, as a for profit enterprise? The answer so far is yes, because there are no laws around it currently.

Since human/animal clones are ALL legal, what if a human clone has 10% animal genes, making it 'legally' non human. Would that allow the above scenario, and if not, why not?  What if brainless human bodies are created, just to create body parts? What if headless 90% human bodies are produced that grow fast like mice, just to experiment on with drugs or military technology?

GMO products are already being patented and then put out into the market place, with horrible results. For more on this, click on link below...

Dr. Robert Lanza; Stem Cell Cloning Advances And Promises/Products Coming Out Of GMO Industry Explored

http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/dr-robert-lanza-stem-cell-cloning.html

HUMAN/ANIMAL CLONING AND HYBRIDS ARE BEING CREATED NOW

Human animal embryos are being created to test drug therapies and manufacture body parts or chemicals to sell on the market. Because these bizarre GMO creatures are not 'human', there are no laws around their development or use. Anything goes. Theoretically, an animal/human could be created to be a hybrid sex slave for humans, with no rights, and available for 'ownership, patenting, and wholesale production. 

REUTERS; SCIENTISTS WANT DEBATE AROUND ANIMALS MADE FROM HUMAN GENES

Reuters; Scientists want debate on animals with human genes -

"Do most of us care if we make a mouse whose blood cells or liver are human? Probably not," he said. "But if it can speak? If it can think? Or if it is conscious in a human way? Then we're in a completely different ballpark."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/11/10/us-science-animal-human-idUSTRE5A900R20091110

Human-animal hybrids and chimeras

Wikipedia; "Parahumans have been referred to as "human-animal hybrids" in a vernacular sense that also encompasses human-animal chimeras. The term parahuman is not used in scientific publications. The term is sometimes used to sensationalise research that involves mixing biological materials from humans and other species.[1] According to Daily Mail, as of 2011, more than 150 human-animal hybrid embryos were created in British laboratories since the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.[2]

Rationale

There are several reasons for which parahumans or chimeras might be created. The current forms of chimera exist for medical and industrial purposes, e.g., production of drugs and of organs suitable for organ transplantation. Other experiments aim to reveal knowledge about the function of the human body, e.g., by creating mice with a human-like immune system to studyAIDS or with a brain incorporating human nerve cells. Restrictions on cloning and stem cell research have made chimera research an attractive alternative.

If a line of parahumans could be created using germline engineering, if they also bred true, and if they were different enough from ordinary humans to be unable to breed with us, then they would qualify as a species. 

Parahumans created using only somatic genetic engineering would have human children. Another key difference is that a germ-line parahuman would have to be modified before birth, while a somatic parahuman could be an adult human who chooses to be modified. Which one is more ethical is a matter of debate. 

An argument for the former is that no harm is done to a person born with modified genes because the person would have had no control over their genes in the first place. An argument for the latter being more ethical is that the changes would be made with informed consent.

Ethics

There is a scientific field of parahuman research. Ethical, moral, and legal issues of parahuman research are speculative extensions of existing issues that arise in actual research.

Some transhumanists see this technology as one of many ways to overcome fundamental human limitations, such as disease and aging, and point out the many potential commercial and medical benefits.[3] The debate can also be seen in terms of individual freedom to use germinal choice technology or reprogenetics.

Other ethical issues (shared with genetic engineering in general) involve the legal and moral status of a hybrid individual or race, whether the decision-making power over its creation should lie with governments or individuals, whether a distinction should be drawn between strictly medical treatments (restoring lost function) and those enhancing humans above some "normal" standard, whether medical ethics allow doctors to offer parahuman-related treatments, and whether xenotransplantation poses risks of cross-species disease transfer.

The developmental biologist Stuart Newman applied for a patent on a human-nonhuman chimera in 1997 as a challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the U.S. Congresson the patentability of organisms.[4]

In the United States of America, H.R. 5910 is a House Resolution entitled Human-Animal Hybrid Prohibition Act of 2008. Representative Chris Smith (R, NJ-4) introduced it into the House on April 24, 2008. The same bill was introduced as S.2358 by Sen. Sam Brownback (R, KS) into the Senate on November 15, 2007."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-animal_hybrid

150 HUMAN/ANIMAL EMBRYOS CREATED SINCE 2008

According to Daily Mail, as of 2011, more than 150 human-animal hybrid embryos were created in British laboratories since the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. 

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CREATION OF ANIMAL-HUMAN MIXTURES: 

5. Animal-Human Transgenesis 

6. Animal-Human Gestation 

6.1. Placing a human embryo into an animal 

6.2. Placing human sperm into an animal

6.3. Placing an animal embryo into a human 

6.4. Placing animal sperm into a woman

7. Animal-Human Hybrid Embryos 

7.1. Embryo containing cells made up of both human and animal chromosomes 

7.1.1. Non-human eggs into which human nuclei are inserted

Frog-Human Hybrid Entities 

7.1.2. Animal-Human chromosome transplant Mouse-Human Hybrids 

7.2. Non-human eggs stripped of their chromosomes into which human nuclei are inserted Gametal Cow-Human Hybrid Embryos Gametal Rabbit-Human Hybrid Embryos 

7.3. Mixing of Animal and Human Gametes Genetic Human-Hamster Hybrid Embryos 18/10/2010 

Ethics of animal-human mixtures. 

2/22 8. Animal-Human Chimeras

8.1. Animal-Human Chimeras Created Through Xenotransplantation 

8.2. Animal-Human Embryonic and Fetal Chimeras 

8.2.1. Incorporation of Human Stem Cells into Post-natal Animals 

8.2.2. Incorporation of (1) Human Stem Cells into Post-blastocyst Stages of Non-human Embryos or (2) Non-human Stem Cells into Post-blatocyst stages of Human Embryos Genetic Human-Mouse Chimeric Fetuses Genetic Sheep-Human Chimeric Fetuses Genetic Monkey-Human Chimeric Fetuses Genetic Pig-Human Chimeric Fetuses 

8.2.3. Incorporation of (1) Human Pluripotent Stem Cells into a Non-Human Blastocyst or its Preliminary Embryonic Stages or

(2) Non-human Pluripotent Stem Cells into a Human Blastocyst or its Preliminary Embryonic Stages Genetic Human-Mouse Chimeric Embryos Glossary

CLONED HUMAN/ANIMAL BODY PARTS CAN BE USED TO IMPLANT INTO HUMANS, WITH NO RESTRICTIONS

In other words, in the context of therapy and preventive medicine, the President's Council accepted that the transplantation of animal parts to replace defective human ones could be considered as ethical. Moreover, the Council had no overriding objection to the insertion of animal-derived genes or cells into a human body - or even into human fetuses.

End

Secret Labs Producing GMO Human Clones And Human/Animal Hybrids, Resulting In GMO Animals With Human Capabilities, New Human Species
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/secret-labs-producing-human-clones-and.html

More articles like this;

Drugs, Medicine, GMO's, Education
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/natural-health-drugs-medicine.html

Teaching the Science Of Sustainable Health And Success

(1,000 + Creative Commons Videos)
http://tinyurl.com/agryoutube

Table of Contents
http://tinyurl.com/agrindex
2,000 + Videos And Articles

Website; www.agreenroadproject.org 

(1,000 + Creative Commons Youtube Videos)
http://tinyurl.com/agryoutube

Table Of Contents
http://tinyurl.com/agrindex
2,000 + Videos And Articles

Links To Other Notable Organizations; via @AGreenRoad

http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/links-to-other-notable-organizations.html

Email Contact; agreenroad@gmail.com

What works for seven future generations, without causing harm?