LATEST OCEAN WATER TESTING RESULTS FROM WHOI
Nov 2014 - Twice as much Fukushima radiation near California coast than originally reported; Highest levels found anywhere in Eastern Pacific — Scientist: Very little we can do… It’s unprecedented… God forbid anything else happens — Gundersen: Multiple plumes now along west coast… Will be coming “for century or more” (AUDIO)
NO ONE RESPONSIBLE, NO ONE TESTING, GOVERNMENT IS NOT TESTING FOR FUKUSHIMA RADIATION IN OCEAN
The video goes into detail about what WHOI does and how it is organized. The video goes into where the money for WHOI comes from.
Even if the government did pay for testing ocean water for radiation, it is not the best thing to test for radiation. Seaweed, fish, mollusks and bottom living organisms are much better things to test because they bio concentrate and bio accumulate radioactive elements. Even finding radiation in the ocean tells the public and health professionals nothing about how that radiation is traveling up the food chain.
WHAT IS THE OCEAN RADIATION TESTING PROGRAM ALL ABOUT?
"Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution's Ken Buesseler EXPECTS THE PUBLIC TO PAY FOR RADIATION OCEAN TESTING... IS NO US GOVERNMENT AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING IT'S CITIZENS OR OCEAN LIFE FROM FUKUSHIMA FALLOUT?
YET WOODS HOLE IS FUNDED BY US GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES TO STUDY DISASTERS AND RADIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ON THE US LAND, SEA AND AIR!
YET WOODS HOLE IS FUNDED BY US GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES TO STUDY DISASTERS AND RADIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ON THE US LAND, SEA AND AIR!
The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has launched a new citizen website to pay the cost of testing Pacific Ocean water for levels of radioactivity. Their idea is to help the public keep a close eye on a plume of water containing radionuclides, or radioactive elements, from the Fukushima Dai-ichi power plant in Japan, WHOI senior scientist Ken Buesseler said during a teleconference Tuesday.
Water containing radioactive cesium-134 should be hitting the U.S. West Coast including Alaska any day now, but it's hard to know for sure since no U.S. government agency is responsible for monitoring radioactivity in the ocean, Buesseler said.
WOODS HOLE PARTNERS SPONSORS~EPA, NOAA, NIOH, NSF, SCRIPPS INSTITUTE OF OCEANOGRAPHY -La Jolla, California
WOODS HOLE OCEAN INSTITUTES~tackle many of society's greatest issues, including climate change, sustaining and conserving ocean ecosystems, and responding to disasters.
http://www.whoi.edu/main/ocean-instit..."
Source; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-vI1TyEsfA
What is WHOI spending all of the money they DO receive on? Wouldn't you think that Fukushima would take the highest priority, ahead of everything else they may have done or will do?
Source; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-vI1TyEsfA
MISSION OF WHOI IS TO PROTECT US PUBLIC FROM OCEAN POLLUTION, TOXINS AND DISASTERS, SO WHY IS NONE OF THE MONEY THEY GET GOING TO THIS PURPOSE?
With all of these HUGE and very money rich sources of funding (shown in the pictures above) and a mission to protect the US public from ocean pollution, ocean toxins and disasters such as Fukushima, why is there no money to 'fund' ocean radiation and/or sea creature bio accumulation radiation testing via WHOI or any other marine research organization? Why is the 'public' being asked to send in dimes and nickels? Where are all of these agencies and foundations sending THEIR money to?
What is WHOI spending all of the money they DO receive on? Wouldn't you think that Fukushima would take the highest priority, ahead of everything else they may have done or will do?
Maybe, just maybe, there are other motives at work. In this interview, University of Victoria professor Jay Cullen says that Fukushima radiation does not exist, because nothing melted down, and nothing happened at Fukushima. Isn't this roughly the same thing that the people at WHOI are saying? http://youtu.be/jXMA9FcmecA?t=15m53s
WHOI HAS 35 MILLION DOLLARS TO DO OCEAN RADIATION TESTING
Via CodeShutdown August 14, 2014 "The paltry "crowdsource" funding and samples of water for Beusellers radiation monitoring program seem a farce...
Woods Hole has $30,300,000 in lab equipment
$200,000,000 operating revenue (Yes, 200 MILLION Dollars)
Net assets 330 million
151 man scientific staff and 222 man technical staff
$81,500,000 endowment funds (Yes, 81 MILLION Dollars)
A $16.5 million endowment included $5.7 million for research; and $3.9 million is unrestricted. They can do what they want with millions of dollars, 30 million dollars of lab equipment and 370 scientists and technical staff.
WHOI biogeochemist Mak Saito is one of 16 scientists who will receive funds from a total of up to $35 million to research marine microbial ecology.
WHOI HAS 35 MILLION TO RESEARCH MARINE MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, BUT NONE OF THAT MONEY IS STUDYING EFFECT OF FUKUSHIMA RADIATION ON FOOD CHAIN, STARTING WITH MICROBES
WHOI has 35 million dollars to research marine microbial ecology, which can and should include radiation and population testing of microbes in the Pacific, right? Odds are, this will NEVER happen. Why not? For some VERY strange reason, 99.999% of all government money is going to prove that radiation has no effect on anything, rather than the other way around. Meanwhile, the coast and quite possibly the ocean is being sterilized, and this started in 2011. But no scientists or biologists are talking about this or researching it, especially if it is is connected to radiation as a cause.
200 Kilometers Of Canadian Pacific Coast Line Dead Zone Devoid of 99% Of All Life
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/200-kilometers-of-canadian-pacific.html
Via CodeShutdown November 21, 2014 "kiss the whales goodbye. Buesseler et al continue to say there is no danger, but even if the C137 were 1/14 the above measurement, whales will be 10x Japanese safety levels. Extinction level event.
Researchers developed a model for killer whales based on less than 0.5 becquerels per cubic metre. The models indicate that in 30 years, Cesium 137 levels in the whales will exceed the Canadian guideline of 1,000 becquerels per kilogram — 10 times the Japanese guideline.
HUGE MARINE RESEARCH STAFF, YET NONE OF THEM CAN DO OCEAN RADIATION RESEARCH OR INVESTIGATE FUKUSHIMA RADIATION EFFECTS ON LIFE IN THE OCEAN
Via CodeShutdown November 21, 2014 "Buesseler has 45 marine crew… and 4 million unrestricted funds to test whatever but he is hoping the public will collect some specimens and fund a test when the inconsequential plume gets closer to shore. Nice enough looking bloke, a reprehensible weasel. Looks deceive. World dominated by psychopathic fascists, enabled by hordes of sellouts.
Woods Hole
scientific staff … 151
technical staff … 200
research and technical support staff …92
guest investigators … 208
marine crew … 45
Dont fund Kenny, fund AGreenRoad!
Via LastChants Teri -in NE WA November 21, 2014 Code…thanks for the Kenny stats. That's amazing and horrible that with such a huge crew and backup, he can't figure out how to get something done that really identifies the reality! Certainly not anyone to count on.
There are 696 people involved in WHOI, but NONE of them are doing anything around testing for Fukushima radiation. This is really hard to believe. Scripps and other institutes probably have the same thing and same number, so we are talking about THOUSANDS of people who are ignoring, denying and suppressing information around Fukushima, the greatest radiation industrial accident in history. Your tax dollars are hard at work, funding pencil pushers and pundits who do nothing more than give PR talks about how safe radiation is, and compare it to bananas.
WHY IS THIS WATER TESTING PROGRAM USELESS, DECEPTIVE, WORTHLESS AND GOING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION?
First;
Why is the PUBLIC being asked to directly fund this 'campaign' featuring children in pretty pictures, and a glossy PR campaign, when the US government and many agencies fund the Woods Hole to do this very thing? Why is Woods Hole denying that US government agencies or foundations that make up a bulk of their funding, do not include or allow radiation monitoring?Second;
Besides WHOI, there are MANY other nuclear labs, the EPA and FDA. All of these, plus Woods Hole have funds and very expensive radiation testing equipment in dozens of labs that can test food, liquids, and give whole body radiation scans to children, as well as testing ocean living creatures and algae for radiation.What else are they spending all of their existing funds on, if not this kind of thing? Wouldn't you think that testing for radiation in foods, animals, vegetables, fruits and sea creatures would be the highest thing on their priority list too, seeing that Fukushima is the biggest mega nuclear disaster in history? Why is Fukushima not even a subject worth researching and talking about?
Third;
Ocean water is the WORST thing to test, because it has the lowest and hardest to measure levels of anything radioactive in it. Ocean water was already tested and found to contain radiation in it; that is a FACT. Why would anyone have to test it some more?Fourth;
Via Richard Wood "Reviewing Buesselers sample preparation methodology specific to this testing made me leery of his work results. The desiccation method he uses would effectively destroy the sample integrity and his procedures do not allow for the measurement of the elements lost in that preparation before it ever gets near the instrument.
Most of the energy signatures that would be found from this are alpha particles which I do not believe his test instruments are tuned to. Of overall note he does not discuss or draw out decay elements that are the signature or fingerprint of each and every nuclear event on the planet.
There are elemental isotopes that are deadly secret and can not be talked about. I am tired of not hearing of these deadliest of elements that were and are being released from Fukushima, like the Pu (plutonium) isotopes that may comprise up to 30% of the fissile material that is leaking into the air and ocean. What is up with that stuff anyway, whatever it is."
MASSIVE COVERUP IN MARINE BIOLOGY FIELD?
Kevin Blanch talks about the massive coverup going on within the marine biology research facilities. He talks specifically about the Scripps Instititute, in La Jolla. They are a 'partner' with WHOI.
IS THERE DIRECT EVIDENCE OF MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF RADIATION GOING INTO PACIFIC?
Is there any direct scientific evidence that a massive amount of radiation was released by the Fukushima mega nuclear disaster?
The answer is YES! Scientists at WHOI as well as others tracked and measured ocean radiation and they provide the evidence.... (Click on link below to get the details of where these numbers came from)
Event Peak Radiation Reading In Bq/m³
2,400 Nuclear weapons testing peak - 100 Bq/m³
Chernobyl caused a peak reading of - 1,000 Bq/m³
Fukushima caused a peak reading of - 180,000,000 Bq/m³
Based on the above numbers, wouldn't you agree that anyone with common sense would come up with the following conclusion?
Chernobyl was around ten times worse than 2,400 nuclear bombs going off.
Chernobyl was around ten times worse than 2,400 nuclear bombs going off.
Fukushima was around 180,000 times worse than 2,400 nuclear bombs going off.
2014 - Fukushima Ocean Radiation Compared To Chernobyl and 2,400 Open Air Nuclear Bomb Tests; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/05/fukushima-radiation-measured-in-pacific.html
Despite all of this, no research is being done to see what is happening in the food web of the Pacific ocean, from bottom to top.
NOTHING.
NO ONE.
Just one crowd funded project to test ocean water.
This is pitiful at best and criminal at worst.
Despite all of this, no research is being done to see what is happening in the food web of the Pacific ocean, from bottom to top.
NOTHING.
NO ONE.
Just one crowd funded project to test ocean water.
This is pitiful at best and criminal at worst.
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE WEB OF LIFE AND WHERE IS FUKUSHIMA RADIATION GOING?
Bottom line, any scientist or biologist or nuclear 'expert' who is still messing around with trying to 'find' radiation in ocean water is guilty of misleading and deceiving the public. Plenty of studies have already been done on this subject, and the direct and irrefutable evidence is there. Just click on the link above and all of the important 'scientific' studies confirm that the ocean (and the rest of the world) took a huge radioactive 'hit'. The next stage of research should be to find out where the radiation is going and what negative effects it is having. True scientists should NOT be denying anything bad happened and that there is no effect, not unless they are shills for the nuclear industry, that is.
The IMPORTANT question is; what is happening in the living web of life, as a result of this massive amount of radiation that came out of Fukushima?
Up until Nov 2014, doing ocean water tests just to report that nothing is being found, and that radiation levels are 1,000 percent below 'natural' background levels is misleading and very deceptive. Jay Cullen is going even further and claiming that nothing at Fukushima melted down, and nothing dangerous came out. His 'expert' conclusion is nothing more than a fairy tale and goes along with the pro nuclear industry PR spin machine.
Things are MUCH worse than they are being portrayed in the mass media... 99% of what has happened and what is going on now at Fukushima is being actively covered up, denied and hidden, including by organizations such as WHOI, EPA, NRC, IAEA, FDA, etc. Can you handle the truth? If not, that is ok, come back later when you are ready.
Fukushima; Reactors And/Or SFP's In #5 And #6 Melted Down - Total of 7 Melt Down's, Melt Outs, Nuclear Explosions
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/07/fukushima-reactors-andor-sfps-in-5-and.html
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES AND TESTS NEED TO BE DONE ON:
What is happening in the web of life? Are species being negatively affected by radiation?
What kinds of radioactive elements are coming up the food chain and in what amounts?
What is the whole body internal radiation count in CHILDREN in the US?
What is the effect on children's genetic structure from Fukushima radiation?
Who is doing this kind of testing?
NOT WHOI!
NOT SCRIPPS!
NO OTHER MARINE RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS!
How Dangerous Is 400-6000 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima? Via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/how-dangerous-is-400-6000-pounds-of.html
What is the effect on children's genetic structure from Fukushima radiation?
Who is doing this kind of testing?
NOT WHOI!
NOT SCRIPPS!
NO OTHER MARINE RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS!
It turns out that almost NO ONE is doing this kind of testing, in terms of scientists and biologists who are funded by huge foundations and government agencies. Why not? Why have they been historically ABSENT from any studies like this, historically at Chernobyl, TMI, and now after Fukushima, the biggest mega nuclear disaster in history?
The ONLY person who seems to be doing ANY of this very needed research is Dana.. a citizen journalist and researcher. How sad and pathetic is this state of affairs, when the LARGEST, WORST radiation mega disaster in the history of humankind is minimized, denied, ignored and covered up by just about everyone in the scientific, government, nuclear industry, education and biology world?
Why is it that the only person willing to do anything that will actually give some useful information about where this MASSIVE release of radiation is going and what effect it will have on the living web of life, is a private citizen who is disabled? No wonder he is so upset, at the end of this video... Everyone should be feeling this, just like Dana is.. The Pandora's box of horrors has been opened, and the horrors are coming out..
RESEARCH SHOULD BE FOCUSED ON PLUTONIUM, THE MOST DEADLY MAN MADE ELEMENTS OF ALL
How Dangerous Is 400-6000 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima? Via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/how-dangerous-is-400-6000-pounds-of.html
Scientists: Fukushima radiation is causing “serious biological effects” — Disaster’s widespread impact now being revealed — “Major irreversible shifts” in ecosystems discussed — “High rates of abnormality and mortality”… severe damage to humans next? (PHOTOS)
PERSONAL ACCOUNTS BY LONG TIME RESIDENTS NEAR OCEAN
Via Pu239 August 14, 2014 "Dana is right. I live about 100 paces (1 min. walk) from the ocean (Brentwood Bay, BC = Vancouver Island). Eerily quiet, almost no birds, little life on the shore. Some sick-looking moon-jellyfish, some sea lettuce. Very few seagulls, one or two crows. (We did see one seagull, mournfully staring at the mudflats – looking for somewhere to stick its beak, something to eat). Used to see stellars jays around here. Disappeared about three years ago and never seen them since."
obewanspeaks August 14, 2014 "Yes, exactly the same thing I witnessed in person in 2011 and 2012 along the California and Oregon coastlines. There was nothing alive anywhere.. I am afraid the HORROR has just begun and we really do need to shut this entire Nuclear Industry down while we still can via International Law~Worldwide! The Nuclear Industry is a piss poor jobs program..we must bury this Failed Nuclear Technology while we still can!"
Via uwantsun August 16, 2014 "Well, as a very longtime surfer in Ventura Calif I and others can definately tell you the following facts:
1. The gull and other bird species presence at the local surf breaks have diminished considerably. And on many days in a row, especially when the air is very wet, as we call it, with moisture, they are mostly gone. This is a massive change from before 2011, when these sea birds OWNED the beaches.
2. The sand, tide, and currents have changed, changing the surf breaks. This began to appear in late summer to early 2012. To the point with the state of calif. has been using dumptrucks to replace the sand and building small rock seawalls to contain the weird and NEW erosion patterns that had stayed mostly unchanged in the last 30 years of my being in these waters.
3. Also, we don't see as many dolphins as we used out in the lineup. Was a time, every weekend, you would see two or three pods a day swimming around the surfers outside, now, haven't seen any all year."
Via Crickets August 16, 2014 " I was born in California. I've lived most of my life within walking distance of the ocean. I've never seen sea life dying off like it has been lately. Starfish may have died off in the past, but not in the numbers we're seeing now. I have never seen massive schools of anchovies and other fish washing up on the shore like I've seen over the past few years. I've never heard of, or seen, sea mammals dying on the beaches like they have been dying lately. So don't try to downplay the significance of these events. You may find stories of these things happening before 3/11, but hasn't the world been a dump for nuclear waste and a testing ground for nuclear weapons for decades now? Perhaps it's only now we're seeing the cumulative affects of these atrocious events. Perhaps the more recent and much more serious nuclear meltdowns seen in FUKU, and the subsequent ongoing and uncontrolled release of radioactive water into the Pacific, and plume of radioactive particles that circle the globe as we speak are finally taking their toll."
Via Heart of the Rose August 14, 2014 "At Fukushima, genomic instability needs to be followed up over generations, starting with grandparents and parents, then the children and grand children. After a year, the damage caused by the mixture of internal and external radiation to children should be measured, by comparison with data from before 2011 in the same areas, or by comparing data with communities further away, that were spared the radioactive fallout. Birthweight, incidence of stillbirth, perinatal mortality up to 28 days, birth deformities (heart problems should be investigated later), and among the genetic diseases, Down’s syndrome, should all be studied. Brain damage with tumours, and developmental retardation which, like decreases in IQ, will become evident at school age." Genetic mutations from radiation exposure are up to 100 times higher than anything we have encountered in the animal kingdom -Dr. Fernex, Former WHO Consultant"
July 31 2012
Chief closes salmon fishing to his tribe, due to abnormal salmon with skin coming off of them (never seen before)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=337486613082610&set=pcb.337486653082606&type=1
Picture of fish with skin coming off of it
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=337486633082608&set=pcb.337486653082606&type=1
Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Radiation Effects
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/animals-and-low-level-radiation-effects.html
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=337486613082610&set=pcb.337486653082606&type=1
Picture of fish with skin coming off of it
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=337486633082608&set=pcb.337486653082606&type=1
Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Radiation Effects
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/animals-and-low-level-radiation-effects.html
WHAT KINDS OF SAMPLES TO TAKE IF YOU ARE GOING OUT AS CITIZEN INVESTIGATOR OR RESEARCHER
Especially if you find any dead creatures, take a tissue sample; liver, thyroid, heart, and bone. These types of things will be good samples to test for iodine, strontium, and cesium, which will be the easiest to find. Keep the samples separated, but you can collect thyroids from many animals and combine them together as an example.
Use an ice chest with dry ice, to freeze all samples, or regular ice sprinkled with salt to keep it colder, second best.
Take plant and animal samples as a FIRST priority, because this is where the MOST and highest levels of bioaccumulated radiation will show up. Some animal species will have higher levels than others, but those on the bottom of the ocean and those in the tidal zone will end up with the highest levels, because that is where the radiation accumulates the most.
Radiation In Ocean Mist And Spray Can Travel Inland Up to 300 Kilometers; via @AGreenRoad
The radiation will bio concentrate and bio magnify and show up in living creatures in the easiest to measure way, especially FILTER FEEDERS, starfish, and bottom feeders.. Even collecting ocean algae and plankton will work. Just freeze and dry them before testing.
Plutonium And Cesium Bioaccumulation Up To 26,000 Times In Ocean Algae, Up To 5,570,000 Bq/Kg in Land Algae, Biomagnification From There; via @AGreenRoad
Freeze these samples in labelled baggies, and then dry out the samples later when you get ready to test them.. See if Arnie Gunderson or someone like him will do the tests for free with sensitive shielded testing equipment, such as the following....
Food Radiation Testing Machine Choices And How To Set Up A Community Or Store Based Testing Center; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/what-is-scintillation-counter-and-how.html
2014 - Radiation Detector, Gamma Spectroscope and Dosimeter - Polimaster 1703MO-1B (Review)
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-polimaster-1703mo-1b-gamma.html
Radiation In Food/Water, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-level-nuclear-radiation-in-food-and.html
Bioaccumulation Of Radiation In Fresh Water And Salt Water Fish After Chernobyl And Fukushima, Plus How To Test Food For Radiation Contamination; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/04/bioaccumulation-of-radiation-in-fresh.html
Mothers With Kids Get Grocery Store To Set Up Food Radiation Testing Machine; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/mothers-with-kids-get-grocery-store-to.html
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-polimaster-1703mo-1b-gamma.html
Radiation In Food/Water, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-level-nuclear-radiation-in-food-and.html
Any living cells will work, from algae to seals and everything in between... Be sure to DRY all samples before testing, because water is a good 'insulator' against radiation. Doing a 'wet' test is another trick that scientists use to minimize and deny all or most radiation in living things. By doing 'wet' radiation measurements, rather than dry, it is much easier to cover up and deny the harmful effects of radiation on living things because the readings will come out much lower, as water blocks radiation. (This is why the nuclear industry uses water around nuclear fuel rods.) A sensitive pancake style Geiger counter will show something if levels are high enough, but they are not designed to detect radiation inside of people, animals or vegetables. Directions for how to test for radiation in food are provided in the next article/link below.
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/04/bioaccumulation-of-radiation-in-fresh.html
Mothers With Kids Get Grocery Store To Set Up Food Radiation Testing Machine; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/mothers-with-kids-get-grocery-store-to.html
Soil, mud and sand samples MAY show something. Mud will be the best to test, again after drying it out. But realize that these things are also going to be diffuse and diluted sources of radiation. This sampling should only be if one has time, energy and resources, AFTER testing all living things FIRST.
Finally, why do ordinary people like Dana and AGRP have to the work that biologists and scientists are supposed to be doing? Why do whistleblower and investigative journalists have to muckrake this very sad situation which is present at nuclear labs, the EPA, the FDA and WHOI? Who is going to order them to do their jobs, or lose all of their funding? Maybe it is time to give some money to the people who are actually doing the truth telling and research around Fukushima, rather than the opposite? After all, what do we have to fear, other than fear itself? What is the truth worth? Certainly we know what lying, cover ups, denial and deception is worth and what that money will buy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Time Donation - AGRP Online Magazine - Monthly Donation - AGRP Online Magazine
A Green Road Eco Clothing/Products Store - Shop At A Green Road Amazon Store
More ways to support A Green Road Projects - AGRP Website - Twitter - Facebook
Get Magazine Delivered To Your Email Address - AGRP App For Smartphones - Index
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End
Why (WHOI) Woods Hole And Ken Buesseler Ocean Water Testing For Radiation Is Not Worth Supporting Financially
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/why-whoi-woods-hole-and-ken-buesseler.html
Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear War
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/why-whoi-woods-hole-and-ken-buesseler.html
Teaching the Science Of Sustainable Health And Success. What works for 7 future generations without causing harm? To access a library full of articles, movies, books and videos, click on links below.
Website and email form contact page
A Green Road Project Magazine
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type search term to find any article
- Click on pages in upper left corner to see index of all subjects
Teaching the Science Of Sustainable Health And Success. What works for 7 future generations without causing harm? To access a library full of articles, movies, books and videos, click on links below.
A Green Road Project Magazine
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type search term to find any article
- Click on pages in upper left corner to see index of all subjects
911 Planet Emergencies
Spiritual, Interfaith, Consciousness; How To Create Heaven On Earth
Holistic Living, Health, Self Healing, Environment And Renewable Energy
Inner and Outer Mysteries of Life
Peace, War, Human Rights, Justice, Prisons, And Violence Prevention
Drugs, Medicine, Medical Radiation and GMO's
Art And Science Of Deception; Global Corporations And The 1%, Whistleblowers, And Solutions
Low Dose Radiation Dangers, Symptoms For Children And Adults
Effects Of Internal Low Level Nuclear Radiation
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/effects-of-internal-low-level-nuclear.htmlRadiation In Food/Water, Geiger Counters, Dosimeters, Radiation Readings
Animals, Insects, Birds And Plants Radiation Effects
Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear War
Uranium Mining and Enrichment, Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing, Fracking
Nuclear Accidents, Recycling, Nuclear Fuel
Individual Radioactive Elements/Isotopes, USA Radiation Exposure Prevention and Reversal, Music
Nuclear Reactor Recertification, Relicense
Long Term Storage Of Nuclear Fuel, Nuclear Waste
"Do not go where the freeway may lead - Go instead where there is no path and leave A Green Road for others to follow."
…………………………………………………………………………………
Social Media Links
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
“Never give up, never.” Every person is important. Connect with AGRP and other birds of a feather.
View; AGRP Facebook Page
Subscribe; YouTube Channel
Network; LinkedIn Professionals Network
Connect; Google+
………………………………………………………………………………
A Green Road is where heart and paradigm shift happens. Featuring sustainable green living news, movies, articles and videos from cutting edge minds and hearts, AGRP asks the question; what will benefit seven future generations without causing harm? AGRP teaches the Science of Sustainable Health, through articles, videos and books.
Share the article/video titles and links by copying and pasting them into email, Facebook and Twitter. Thanks for doing your part. Keep shining your light and sharing this information with friends, co-workers, politicians, doctors, professors, and other leaders!
إرسال تعليق