A Single Drop Of Wine On a Tablecloth From A Glass Of Red Wine Story
Here is the scene.
John pours himself a glass of red wine and a small drop of wine falls and ends up making a red spot on the brand new, white tablecloth. John hides the spot from his wife. But eventually Lisa, his wife, finds the spot and is angry at John for ruining the tablecloth she just bought, because there is no way to get out this permanent stain, and the tablecloth is now worthless, and it needs to be thrown out…
Lisa says to John;
- You are not careful enough! See what you have done to my beautiful tablecloth! Damn! It is ruined forever!
- Lisa, you are hallucinating!
-John, what do you mean? You have completely ruined the tablecloth! Are you blind?
-Hey there, Lisa my beloved, shush, shush, quiet down. There is nothing to be excited about. Yes, a small drop of red wine fell on the tablecloth. I cannot even see the drop anymore, because I folded over the edge near where it made a stain, so the drop of wine disappeared. Besides, you still have 99.9999% of the tablecloth that is all white, so this tiny red spot makes no difference at all. All I see is whiteness, with no red spot at all. All you have to do is ignore the tiny folded over part of the tablecloth and concentrate on the rest of the very large, perfectly white tablecloth.. Now why won't that work for you, honey? Can't you see that I am being perfectly logical and reasonable?
You can guess what Lisa said to John after that.. and they did not live happily ever after.
The end
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION THEORY DEBUNKED
Nuclear scientists say that if you can't prove a direct causative link to a death caused by radiation, then NO deaths are caused by radiation. All of the nuclear experts follow and use this logic. They refer to their belief by saying; "Correlation is not causation." This illogical conclusion is full of holes and stains, just like the tablecloth above. Why?
The nuclear experts use an internal dose that uses a factor of (Sv/Bq) which does the same thing that John did with the stained and ruined tablecloth, but they use a different language than John did, with a very ego centered, haughty arrogance. This theory and the false statistics that come out of it cause many negative consequences to all human, animal and plant living beings.
The nuclear experts use an internal dose that uses a factor of (Sv/Bq) which does the same thing that John did with the stained and ruined tablecloth, but they use a different language than John did, with a very ego centered, haughty arrogance. This theory and the false statistics that come out of it cause many negative consequences to all human, animal and plant living beings.
Internal radiation contamination is like very tiny little red drops of wine on a large white tablecloth. The drops of wine are so small, that they are almost invisible. (Different drops of wine ONLY fall on different parts of the tablecloth at random points, according to pro nuclear experts.)
However, this false belief is totally bunk/hokum and the nuclear experts know it. In the body, radioactive particles collect and concentrate in specific organs or glands, depending on the man made radioactive element. Radioactive iodine particles accumulates and concentrates in the thyroid. Ask any doctor and they will admit this basic scientific fact.
Radioactive strontium particles settle in the bones, but tritium circulates through the whole body, etc. These tiny radioactive particles act like internal miniature machine guns, firing radioactive bullets against cells around them, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The nuclear experts say that this 'internal radiation machine gun' does not exist and causes absolutely no damage, because they are just random and leave the body quickly, without causing harm.
However, this false belief is totally bunk/hokum and the nuclear experts know it. In the body, radioactive particles collect and concentrate in specific organs or glands, depending on the man made radioactive element. Radioactive iodine particles accumulates and concentrates in the thyroid. Ask any doctor and they will admit this basic scientific fact.
Radioactive strontium particles settle in the bones, but tritium circulates through the whole body, etc. These tiny radioactive particles act like internal miniature machine guns, firing radioactive bullets against cells around them, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The nuclear experts say that this 'internal radiation machine gun' does not exist and causes absolutely no damage, because they are just random and leave the body quickly, without causing harm.
When the nuclear “official experts” calculate the damage that these supposedly random and diffused 'tiny red wine drops' or machine gun bullets cause to the human body, they use the “John disappeared the wine drop” logic. The drops are diluted in a big white space, so the tiny little 'red drops' of radiation then can have no negative effect. This argument is completely illogical and false, as any woman with red wine spots on her tablecloth knows, without even any degree or scientific nuclear training. Any woman KNOWS, that one small drop of red wine ruins the tablecloth, completely. Any person shot with only one small bullet into the heart also knows that they got shot, without any logical 'interpretation'.
Ask the 'nuclear experts' a simple question. “Could you please tell me how to do the ARITHMETIC operation to produce this INTERNAL dose factor? Then tell me what effect this dose factor has on seven future generations genetically if the radiation internally in the body is inside of or near the egg or sperm cells?” They cannot answer these two questions. They definitely don't want to answer, because these are their worst nightmare questions.
None of these 'John' experts can answer your questions above with specific math and numbers because they don’t know. (Eventually they may send you algebra (De/Dm =Energy/mass), but without any “numbers” this algebra does not mean anything.) Even if they do know the answer, they won't tell you, because it will make nuclear energy look very bad for your health, and much more so for your infant's health, and even worse for future generations. They know that any dose of radiation is around 200 to 2,000 times worse for a newborn baby and even worse for a fetus, embryo, egg or sperm cell, due to rapid cell division and sensitivity to radioactive iodine at particular stages of growth, just to point at a few things that the nuclear industry avoids talking about.
The nuclear experts are educated to ignore this elemental (and very simple) point that is so very important to understand for a long healthy life, and for seven future generations. They open a book, take a magic number or value and then multiply this by another arbitrary number (Bq) and form a very arbitrary conclusion, picked out of the air, at random.
But they are not able to verify if the factor or the number that they use is any good or whether it is completely bogus and worthless. This is what they call 'science'. Our lives are in the hands of these people, who pretend to know more than a simple woman with no education who knows when her tablecloth is completely ruined and worthless due to spilled red wine that soaked into the cloth and made a permanent spot. They are actually nothing more than “John Wine” experts, but they have convinced themselves that they are all Albert Einstein's.
The internal dose factors used by nuclear experts were and still are created by the military. Without these fake values that are completely made up and fictional, there would be no more atomic bombs or nuclear power plants. The military has only one interest. They only want their soldiers to not die immediately after they are exposed to internal radiation contamination. Other than that, they do not care what happens to the soldiers, their families or to seven future generations of their soldiers children due to internal radiation exposure.
By AIPRI via http://aipri.blogspot.com and A Green Road Project
Note; The above article refers to the internal radiation proximity effect discovered by Maurice Eugène André. André was a NBCR NATO commander. After his military career, he studied and taught others about the internal effects of man made radiation. He was also a friend of Dr. Gofman and Tamplin.
80 TONS OF PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM STILL AIRBORNE GLOBALLY
According to Prof. Paolo Scampa, there is no less than 80 tons of U235 and Pu239 that is still in the air globally, and it is made up of invisible 'hot particles'. (2014 figures) Radioactivity decay will result in a greater radiotoxicity of these man made elements for the next 60 years, due to Am241 buildup for example. Prof. Paolo Scampa is offering a book he wrote about this subject for free, at the following website. (French only)
La chambre à gaz atomique. Traité de physique sur la contribution des essais nucléaires à la contamination finale de l’atmosphère. Prof. Paolo Scampa ( Italy ) – copyright 2011, published by V.F.F. Research Institute “ Mare Nostrum “ e.V. ( EM-024-2011 ) Im Rasental 6 A - 8410 – Wildon ( Austria )
http://www.vff-marenostrum.org/News/La-chambre-gaz-atomique-P.Scampa-2012.pdfTHE DON'T WORRY BE HAPPY CAMP THEORY DEBUNKED BY ARNIE GUNDERSON
Internal versus external radiation exposure is explained by Arnie Gundersen a nuclear expert with many years of industry experience. The don't worry be happy camp always tries to compare man made radioactive elements that are inhaled or ingested to 'external' radiation such as the sun, cosmic radiation on airplane flights, and Xrays in a medical setting.
The be happy don't worry camp also uses false computer estimates, such as trying to say one hot particle radiation dose in the lung has the same effect as a cosmic ray being diffused through the whole lung or even the whole body, which has the effect of reducing the amount of radiation the body is receiving from that one hot particle to permissible levels.
The don't worry be happy camp comparison and computer model does not work. Cosmic rays pass through a person, and leave forever. The sun is an external infrared radiation (not even ionizing radiation) choice, and we can expose ourselves to this infrared and UV radiation when we choose, limiting our exposure by timing and using sun screen.
The skin blocks harmful rays and protects itself by producing anti radiation protective pigments, which we know as tanning. We have evolved in this environment and are used to the sun's radiation and cosmic rays, but humans have little or no defense against artificial, man made radioactive elements such as plutonium for example.
The skin blocks harmful rays and protects itself by producing anti radiation protective pigments, which we know as tanning. We have evolved in this environment and are used to the sun's radiation and cosmic rays, but humans have little or no defense against artificial, man made radioactive elements such as plutonium for example.
Xrays are like cosmic rays; they pass through the body, and then are gone. Yes, all of this radiation is cumulative, and there is no safe dose of radiation. Even one Xray can harm a fetus and can cause leukemia in that child later in life, according to medical studies.
THE UNIQUE PROBLEM POSED BY MANMADE RADIATION
The problem with man made radioactive elements such as plutonium, tritium, strontium, cesium and more is that they are all ingested and inhaled by everyone on the planet. Humans have not evolved to handle these artificial, radioactive, toxic heavy metal man made elements. Humans have no evolutionary history with things like tritium and plutonium, just like the Indians had no history with European diseases brought in by settlers.
These heavy metal and radioactive 'hot particles' lodge internally, where they do damage CONSTANTLY, in a NEVER ENDING way. There is no choice. Humans cannot get out of the way; there is no protective shade or mechanism in the body to protect us from this artificial, internal, man made type of radiation which keeps firing radioactive bullets inside, non stop.
MAN MADE RADIOACTIVE PLUTONIUM HAS NO PURPOSE, SERVES NO POSITIVE ROLE IN LIVING THINGS
Plutonium has no useful, positive purpose. It is both a toxic heavy metal and a highly dangerous alpha radiation source, which damages or kills cells nearby, as shown in the video above. One micro gram of plutonium can and does kill a person, through the mechanism illustrated in the video, where the radiation kills and damages cells nearby, causing cancer.
Just one hot particle of plutonium in the lungs can initiate cancer by damaging the DNA in a nearby cell. The more internal radiation one has, the odds go up that years later, one is diagnosed with lung or other type of cancer, especially in higher risk populations, such as infants, children or women. Plutonium mimics iron.
Strontium mimics calcium, and can do the same thing in the bones, causing leukemia, aplastic anemia, or other bone problems. Cesium mimics potassium, and affects the muscles, organs and the heart specifically in a negative way. Depending on the internal 'load', the risk just keeps increasing for all of these. Man made radioactive elements have only been around since the atomic age and not before.
There was zero 'natural' background radiation consisting of plutonium, tritium, cesium and strontium before the atomic age. Now the 'background' radiation that consists of these radioactive and deadly substances is growing and increasing, as is the cancer and disease rate, but the nuclear industry and the medical industry cannot figure out why.
INTERNAL RADIATION HOT SPOT IS LIKE A SNIPER FIRING AT SPECTATORS INSIDE OF A FOOTBALL STADIUM, AND THROWING HAND GRENADES INTO THE CROWD AT RANDOM
As Arnie says, the nuclear industry leaking radiation and having nuclear plant accidents is like having a stadium full of people and one man with a high powered rifle or a grenade. He fires into the crowd and kills ten people during a football game, or he throws the grenade into the section below him. The nuclear industry (ICRP) says this is an acceptable risk, because that one 'hot' particle only damages a few cells around it, in a 'diffuse' manner. But do the people at the football game who are being shot at by a radiation 'gun' and who are dying of cancer, heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, and kids born with genetic defects or stillborn agree?
Via CodeShutdown October 6, 2014 "...Here is one quantified Fukushima radioactive inventory; 2,586E+21 Bq total Fukushima inventory. How much of this will eventually get into the environment, and how much of it is in the environment already? If you don't agree with Strohm, why not give your own quantitative assessment? Isnt that what you pride yourself on? Fact?
Thus far I've heard only one argument from your camp; "since you can't prove a causative link of Fukushima radiation to illness, therefor there is none." Is that the best logic and fact you can come up with to support your accusation that concerned citizens are lunatics, morons and addicted to fear?
To understand why some of us are incensed, consider this analogy; Several men are shooting random bullets (different sources of pollution) into a crowd of people. You ask them to stop but they argue that you can't prove who's bullet caused a wound, thus every man claims he has killed nobody.
Now you cant argue that plutonium, cesium and strontium aren't deadly given enough exposure. In fact they are a lot like microscopic bullets…and you can't argue that a lot of it isn't being discharged into the environment. …So how do you feel about these guys shooting bullets into the crowd? Who are calling you a moron for being concerned?"
DO YOU FEEL LIKE PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH A LOADED RADIOACTIVE GUN?
Do you feel like playing Russian Roulette with an ever increasing number of 'hot particles' and a greater amount of cumulative radiation contamination in food or drinks? How sure are you that these 'hot particles' inside of you are not damaging the genetic code that will be passed on to future generations, right at this moment? How sure are you that plutonium hot particles you inhaled are not firing their radioactive bullets into your lung, which will cause lung cancer or leukemia years down the road, once the incubation time has expired?
One Hot Particle of PLUTONIUM 239, Calculation Of Radiation Damage In Lung
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/one-hot-particle-of-plutonium-239.html
DU HOT PARTICLE IN A LUNG (DEPLETED URANIUM) CALCULATION OF IRRADIATION AND DAMAGE CAUSED
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/du-hot-particle-in-lung-depleted.html
Children And Adults - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-dose-radiation-dangers-for-children.html
Dr. Chris Busby speaks about the effect of internal radiation on women, causing infertility, birth defects, and diseases caused by cumulative and chronic man made radiation exposure. Sperm counts are also falling globally. The future of humanity is at risk, especially in countries where radiation contamination from nuclear disasters is the worst. The radioactive elements can be measured via hair analysis, internal whole body radiation measurements, urine tests, and blood tests.
Safer, non radioactive, renewable energy producing systems such as solar, wind, water, tides, geothermal, hydrogen and more are all available and they are cheaper than nuclear ever will be. With renewables, there is none of this risk, consequences and disaster potentials.
One Hot Particle of PLUTONIUM 239, Calculation Of Radiation Damage In Lung
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/one-hot-particle-of-plutonium-239.html
DU HOT PARTICLE IN A LUNG (DEPLETED URANIUM) CALCULATION OF IRRADIATION AND DAMAGE CAUSED
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/du-hot-particle-in-lung-depleted.html
Children And Adults - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-dose-radiation-dangers-for-children.html
DR CHRIS BUSBY TALKS ABOUT NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON MANY FUTURE GENERATIONS - GENOMIC INSTABILITY
Dr. Chris Busby speaks about the effect of internal radiation on women, causing infertility, birth defects, and diseases caused by cumulative and chronic man made radiation exposure. Sperm counts are also falling globally. The future of humanity is at risk, especially in countries where radiation contamination from nuclear disasters is the worst. The radioactive elements can be measured via hair analysis, internal whole body radiation measurements, urine tests, and blood tests.
FAIR USE NOTICE: Any copyrighted (©) material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues; this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
End
Internal Radiation Danger Explained Via A Drop of Red Wine Story And Sniper In Football Stadium Story
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/08/internal-radiation-danger-explained-via.html
More articles at;
More articles at;
Children And Adults - Negative Effects Of Chronic, Cumulative Man Made Radiation Exposure
Teaching the Science Of Sustainable Health And Success
(1,000 + Creative Commons Videos)
Table of Contents
2,000 + Videos And Articles
Website; www.agreenroadproject.org
(1,000 + Creative Commons Youtube Videos)
http://tinyurl.com/agryoutube
Table Of Contents
http://tinyurl.com/agrindex
2,000 + Videos And Articles
http://tinyurl.com/agryoutube
Table Of Contents
http://tinyurl.com/agrindex
2,000 + Videos And Articles
Links To Other Notable Organizations; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/links-to-other-notable-organizations.html
Email Contact; agreenroad at gmail.com
What works for seven future generations, without causing harm?
Email Contact; agreenroad at gmail.com
What works for seven future generations, without causing harm?
Post a Comment