Prophecy Sign: The build-up of the global police state that will work alongside the Antichrist during the Tribulation
The book of Revelation warns that during the Tribulation period, countless numbers of people will be put to death for the simple act of defiance. Half-way through the seven year period know as the Tribulation, the Antichrist will declare himself to be God and will require, (upon the pain of death), that each person declare their allegiance to him and accept his mark. If by defiance they say no, they will be martyred.
The Antichrist will not be able to act it alone in such evil, but will undoubtedly have a sophisticated police state to do his bidding. Not unlike Adolph Hitler’s Gestapo during World War 2, or the police states that existed in the communist nations behind the Iron Curtain.
Even now we can see the slow but steady build-up towards this global police state. Today we have two articles that attest to that. In the first article, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that residents of that state do not have the right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. If the police deem it necessary, they can at any-time enter anyone’s home without warrant. In the second article, former President, Bill Clinton suggests it would be a good idea if an agency were to be set up that would "debunk" rumours and we suspect also, conspiracies that spread online. Our question is: who would determine what constitutes a malicious rumour or destructive conspiracy? What happens in the future when people fighting against the Antichrist attempt to get information out to the world? Will the governments and agencies of that time declare such attempts to be malicious rumours and thus be forcibly shut-down by the likes of Bill Clinton’s new agency?
From the articles:
The book of Revelation warns that during the Tribulation period, countless numbers of people will be put to death for the simple act of defiance. Half-way through the seven year period know as the Tribulation, the Antichrist will declare himself to be God and will require, (upon the pain of death), that each person declare their allegiance to him and accept his mark. If by defiance they say no, they will be martyred.
The Antichrist will not be able to act it alone in such evil, but will undoubtedly have a sophisticated police state to do his bidding. Not unlike Adolph Hitler’s Gestapo during World War 2, or the police states that existed in the communist nations behind the Iron Curtain.
Even now we can see the slow but steady build-up towards this global police state. Today we have two articles that attest to that. In the first article, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that residents of that state do not have the right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. If the police deem it necessary, they can at any-time enter anyone’s home without warrant. In the second article, former President, Bill Clinton suggests it would be a good idea if an agency were to be set up that would "debunk" rumours and we suspect also, conspiracies that spread online. Our question is: who would determine what constitutes a malicious rumour or destructive conspiracy? What happens in the future when people fighting against the Antichrist attempt to get information out to the world? Will the governments and agencies of that time declare such attempts to be malicious rumours and thus be forcibly shut-down by the likes of Bill Clinton’s new agency?
The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months. It opened its mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander his name and his dwelling place and those who live in heaven. It was given power to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them. And it was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation. Revelation 13:5-7 NIV
From the articles:
In a move that flies not only in the face of the U.S. Constitution but defies common law dating back to the Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that residents of the Hoosier state have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David, writing for the majority, expressed the view that: "A right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest." Short version: A police officer is within his rights to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, while a homeowner is powerless to block or interfere in any with the officer's entry.
__________________________________________
If Bill Clinton had his way, there would be an Internet agency created by the U.S. Clinton Clinton
Indiana
http://www.examiner.com/libertarian-in-national/indiana-supreme-court-citizens-have-no-right-to-resist-unlawful-police-entry
Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_ec169697-a19e-525f-a532-81b3df229697.html
Bill Clinton Muses About Creating Internet Agency to Combat Falsehoods
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/14/clinton-muses-creating-internet-agency-combat-falsehoods/
إرسال تعليق